Placeholder

BUS 372 Module 8 Benchmark-Event Evaluation

$20.00

Quantity:

Product Description

BUS 372 Module 8 Benchmark-Event Evaluation

BUS 372 Module 8 Benchmark-Event Evaluation

BUS372

BUS 372 Module 8 Benchmark – Event Evaluation

Due Date: Jul 30, 2017 23:59:59       Max Points: 160

Details:

Now that you have attended the event, it is time to evaluate the event planning process and the core business practices associated with executing the event.

For this assignment, you will submit a 750-1,000 word written evaluation of the event. You will compile your stakeholder interview information, event artifacts, and observations into a written report that summarizes the event, assesses event planning effectiveness, and offers feedback and suggestions for enhancing the event in the future. Address the following in your evaluation.

  1. Explain the role that core business practices played in the planning and execution of the event. Use stakeholder interview feedback and your own observations related to event promotion, organization, and execution to discuss how well the event coordinator met the event objectives. Cite specific event artifacts, data, and examples in your analysis.
  2. As you think about the execution of the event and the planning skills that were utilized, how effective was the event planner in executing the event? Identify specific strengths and provide suggestions for ways the event could be enhanced in the future. Identify the most important lessons you learned from observing the event planning process and execution.

Prepare this assignment according to APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Benchmark – Event Evaluation 

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
40.0 %Written Reflection Explains the Role of Core Business Practices in the Planning and Execution of the Event C. 5.3 Event Planning Skills: Examine the role of core business practices in the development of sporting events. Written reflection does not include explanation of the role of core business practices in the planning and   execution of the event. Explanation of the role of core business practices in the planning and execution of the event is incomplete. Explanation of the role of core business practices in the planning and execution of the event is complete but lacks relevant details. Explanation of the role of core business practices in the planning and execution of the event is complete and includes relevant details. Explanation of the role of core business practices in the planning and execution of the event is thoroughly explained and includes relevant examples and as supporting evidence.
40.0 %Written Reflection Analyzes Areas of Strength and Opportunities to Improve Event Execution Skills Written reflection does not analyze areas of strength and opportunities for improvement in event execution skills. Analysis of areas of strength and opportunities for improvement in event execution skills is incomplete. Analysis of areas of strength and opportunities for improvement in event execution skills is complete but lacks relevant details. Analysis of areas of strength and opportunities for improvement in event execution skills is complete and includes relevant details. Analysis of areas of strength and opportunities for improvement in event execution skills is thoroughly explained and includes relevant examples as supporting evidence.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of ?primer prose? indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience,   uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
100 %Total Weightage